POLICY TO ACTION TO COMMON GOOD already hear the laughter after reading the title. Maybe even who will ask, where do such impractical oszołomy as a mother Cathy come from?
For centuries known very well that politics is ... Why take the floor, but many wiser have written volumes about it and they were not much thinking at the kitchen sink, but philosophers, scientists, geniuses strategy for achieving the objectives?
obvious reason. Often sentences are wise volumes in the libraries of dusty dust of time, and we are here, we use common sense, observation and his own imagination, who is a politician, what is politics?
Igor Czajka, as the vast majority of people not only in Poland, at the outset of deliberations -
What exactly is a political issue? (
http://igor.czajka.art.pl/ ) defines the stage on his blog, which is politics.
Politics is the art of achieving the goals. And the objectives are achieved by consensus. I would add here - or manipulation, the pressure of lobbyists, shady legal tricks, bribery, use of "blondes", ordinary ignorance, human emotions and .... You can still so long. The consensus has so edges, angles, corners as human weaknesses, conditions, problems and relationships. Hence
sometimes suffer shock Those who compare political declared the vote in the Sejm.
Politics is a desire to gain power. - defines further Igor. Some even claim that this is the only goal.
Is
"politics is the art of achieving the goals", "achieving power"? You can not deny it. It is obvious, but in order for a politician (
Let's take an example here of Igor, the most important at the moment for us Poles ) will clarify the causes of the disaster, but the defense thanks to the security arrangements state, its leaders and citizens.
investigation belongs to the judiciary, conclusions and actions belong to the policy. But they have all the right who claim that "the question of explaining the reason for the disaster is a matter of Smolensk Polish raison d'etat, which can not be seen as an ad hoc policy."
why policies have a duty to ensure that the course of the investigation was fair, objective and meticulous, but free from the pressures of that policy and others. In this sense, the disaster we must not be separated from politics.
But let us not confuse the concepts, I never, despite the best efforts, high ideals and goals, not in order, our homeland. Nie przyjmujmy for granted the definition of which stem not from the truth, but the consistent propaganda.
What we will differ from the left, if we accept and apply this definition of politics? Nie mylmy a method of policy objectives.
If politics is merely "the art of achieving the goals and power" is in no way can we be surprised that so and not otherwise practiced this "art" PO or SLD. It appeals to their electorates to gain power.
If we talk about reasons of state, patriotism, the development of their homeland, the spiritual, economic and social, it's not cut out posługujmy up to the present definition Machiawelego, because it turns out that this was only the word fake to attract a particular electorate.
effects of such a "successful achievement of power" - that promises without coverage and vote contrary to the program, it is cheating the voters, reaching your goals in league with enemies of the Polish. you sooner or later voters will recognize that treated him like a razor to vote that you've done it in the horse that the policy does not provide any value as a person and citizen. As a result, vote your ass on the couch for those who have no purpose but self-interest.
Najdrastyczniejszym example of the effects of a policy of only on the successful achievement of the objectives is to arrive at Hitler and Stalin to power. Did the revolutionaries of the "Flames" Brzozowski can assume that their youthful dreams of justice bury millions of people? Do pangermaniści preaching patriotic and nationalistic terms, can assume that it zawłaszczy Nazism and kill all the millions of people?
And yet it happened, because the morality in politics was made conditional on performance.
Does Solidarity members could believe that after years of demands of the shipyard workers and the organization of the program will be called unrealistic dreaming, and demolished the home will be economically and culturally by the same who then podkulili tail?
And so it happened. We forget that our notion of politics was the human face. Man and the Motherland were its subject.
But not only short memory is our fault, it is primarily the subordination immediate political aims of morality.
If we are talking about defending the homeland, its sovereignty, the economic development of Polish cultural and intellectual, if you are dear to us the ideals of freedom, do not get started on the destruction of what is the essence of politics, and what distinguishes it from systems and mafia activities.
Bring the classic definition:
POLICY TO ACTION FOR THE COMMON GOOD
Only after determining what it is we, Poles, good, we can discuss how to effectively implement the goals and by what methods. How far we should go in a political consensus.
can not be separated from politics because of ethics. Rejection rules in politics is a moral activity, because good and evil is a concept of ethics. The effectiveness only through the implementation of good or evil.
evil in politics are more than our strength. Now it's time for GOOD.
postscript 1 and 2
Our ideas about politics and politicians sometimes examine sociologists. It is worth the look. I recommend here strongly lecture of 184 broadcast incorrect RadiaPL
http://www.4shared.com/audio/VAXh9IjO/Wyklad-B_Fedyszak-Radziejowska.html O standing policy on January 22, 2011 at the University of School of Social and Media Culture in Torun, the scientific symposium - "The Faces of authority," said Dr. Fedyszak - Radziejowska.
If you mention this ad is not for broadcast, because it is already in the archive of radio and everyone can listen to at any time, but because this lesson may be a contribution to our discussion about politics.
assure you that to us, having a policy of heart on the right side, can put a strain on our well-established stereotypes.
And one more thing: My note is not a discussion with Igor pronunciation notes, but only with the definition, which was used for clarification. and is a political issue. On the margins of his considerations, I could finally say, as I understand politics, but somehow there were opportunities to do so. To express its disapproval of narrowing the definition of policies and robbing it of meaning, which gave him no antiquity, and which so beautifully to us the other day in Gdansk in Zaspa, the Sejm, and not only there, he taught John Paul II